Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

gef
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Michael Lawley <lawley@dstc.edu.au>
Full name Michael Lawley <lawley@dstc.edu.au>
Date 2003-05-19 19:02:49 PDT
Message Alex Bagehot wrote:

> what do you think of the xmi diagram interchange proposal from gentleware?

> is it better for frameworks like GEF and JGraph to provide support for
> that rather than focussing on mof or emf?

> It would seem to me to be yes.

I don't have a strong feeling on this one, but I would tend toward an
approach that embedded SVG with the model using namespaces.

The advantage of using a diagram model such as Gentleware et al propose
is that you can leverage MOF/EMF to get both XMI for your domain model
and for the diagram model (EMF then allows these parts to be stored in
the one document or split between documents (Resources)).


The downside is that a real diagram has a lot more than just boxes and
lines, nodes and edges -- there's text (with fonts and styling),
connectedness of lines and possibly shapes, containment (grouping),
shading, etc etc. Do we really want yet another standard defining all
these things?

|v| "analog - the new digital"

--
    Michael Lawley, http://purl.org/NET/lawley
    Scientician.





--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at gef dot tigris dot org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at gef dot tigris dot org