Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

gef
Reply to message

* = Required fields
* Subject
* Body
Attachments
Send reply to
Topic
Author (directly in email)
Please type the letters in the image above.

Original message

Author Alex Bagehot <alex@bagehot.net>
Full name Alex Bagehot <alex@bagehot.net>
Date 2003-05-19 04:32:21 PDT
Message Hi,

what do you think of the xmi diagram interchange proposal from gentleware?

is it better for frameworks like GEF and JGraph to provide support for
that rather than focussing on mof or emf?

It would seem to me to be yes.

I haven't seen it discussed anywhere.

regards,
Alex

ps. your webpage URL link no longer works.

Michael Lawley wrote:
  > Alex Bagehot wrote:
  >
  >
  >>I recently read this article:
  >
  >
  >>http://www.research.​ibm.com/AEM/eum.html​
  >
  >
  >>It basically says that a modelling tool's graphics framework should have
  >>MOF at its core.
  >
  >
  > Better still, it should have MOF2 (eg EMF as a close approximation) at
  > its core.
  >
  > |v| "analog - the new digital"
  >
  > --
  > Michael Lawley, http://purl.org/NET/lawley
  > Scientician.
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > --------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at gef dot tigris dot org
  > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at gef dot tigris dot org
  >
  >





--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at gef dot tigris dot org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at gef dot tigris dot org